Chifire sues Zambian govt at African Court of human rights

Chifire sues Zambian govt at African Court of human rights

The Southern Africa Human Rights Defenders Network has taken exiled human rights defender Gregory Chifire’s case to the African Commission

As part of its use of strategic litigation as a means to protect the rights of human rights defenders (HRDs), the Southern Africa Human Rights Defenders Network (SAHRDN), has launched a complaint with the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights (the African Commission) on behalf of exiled Zamibian human rights defender Gregory Chifire. The complaint filed in terms of Article 55 of the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights (the African Charter), asks the African Commission to, amongst other things, investigate and recommend that a finding of contempt of court by the Supreme Court of Zambia, against Mr Chifire for expressing an opinion on a final judgment is an infringement of the rights to freedom of expression and dignity under Articles 9(2) and 5 of the Charter.
On 23 November 2018, the Supreme Court of Zambia sentenced human rights defender and anti-corruption activist, Gregory Chifire to six years imprisonment on contempt of court charges. Mr Chifire had called for an investigation into potential judicial corruption involving the largest bank and senior judges in the country and was instead arrested and charged with contempt of court for making such a call.
The contempt of court charges against Mr Chifire were brought following an article he wrote about a case where Stanbic Bank (the largest bank in Zambia) referred Savenda, a credit bureau, for blacklisting. In the 9 May 2018 article published on an online news portal, Mr Chifire criticised the ruling of the Supreme Court of Zambia, on the basis that the judges in the case between the two companies seemed not to have followed the law in his opinion. He implicitly questioned whether there had been any form of corruption involved given that in other media reports, investigative journalists reported that the litigant bank had bribed judges from the Supreme Court.
Mr Chifire also wrote a letter to Chief Justice Irene Mambilima of the Supreme Court concerning the matter requesting her to investigate the serious allegations made against the judges and the bank and take remedial action. Instead of the authorities investigating the credible allegations of corruption, the state prefered charges against Mr Chifire and Bishop John Mambo, Chairman of the Board of the Chikondi Foundation (a church-based charitable organisation providing for the poor), who also wrote a letter on the matter to Chief Justice Mambilima. Both men were charged with contempt of court for their letters to the Chief Justice. Mr Chifire denied the charges in a trial which began on 17 July and concluded on 19 September. Mr Chifire was forced into exile before the matter was concluded. On 23 November 2018, the Supreme Court of Zambia found Mr Chifire to be guilty of being in contempt of court and sentenced him to six years imprisonment in absentia.

“This case against Mr Chifire and the manner in which the law was used to silence HRDs is an affront to the three principles in which a democracy is based upon: openness, transparency and accountability.”, said Mr Arnold Tsunga, SAHRDN Chairperson and Africa Director of the International Commission of Jurists.,

“It is the view of the SAHRDN that the way in which Mr Chifire brought the issue of possible judicial corruption to the attention of the Hon Chief Justice fell within the ambit of acceptable conduct on judicial accountability. The conviction and disproportionate sentencing is therefore unfair and a violation of his right to freedom expression” he added.

Beside the right to freedom of expression being violated, the SAHRDN is also concerned that there was a possible infringement of the right to a fair trial, especially the right to be heard by an impartial court, considering that some of the judges who sat on the Supreme Court bench, deciding on his cases, were the same judges against whom Mr Chifire had lodged a complaint before the Judicial Services Commission, and whose conduct he had complained of to the Chief Justice.
The right to freedom of expression plays a crucial role in the functioning of a democracy. The SAHRDN believes that the existence of the right to freedom of expression is foundational to the exercise of other rights that make societies strengthen their democracy. Use of contempt of court proceedings to stifle and prevent people from forming opinions and expressing their views freely is not reasonably necessary in a democracy. The SAHRDN hopes that this complaint to the African Commission and the remedies that are being sought will not only
6 Sturdee Avenue Rosebank, Johannesburg 2196 RSA m:+27766758168 NPO Number: 211-513_NPO

protect the rights of Mr Chifire, but set precedent for many other HRDs in the region experiencing such suppression.
“The SAHRDN felt compelled to take this case as part of its long term protection programme of HRDs under the Hub Cities project in Southern Africa. Mr Chifire as a HRD, had exhausted all the domestic legal remedies available to him in an effort to vindicate his rights” said Timothy Mtambo, SAHRDN Deputy Chairperson and Executive Director of the Centre for Human Rights and Rehabilitation in Malawi. The Supreme Court as the highest court in Zambia acted as a court of first instance in Mr Chifire’s case, sitting as a full bench of 9 judges. There is no domestic recourse to appeal their decision. “It means that Mr Chifire had come to a dead end in Zambia and the SAHRDN as part of its mandate to protect HRDs in Southern Africa was left with no option but to pursue litigation at the African Commission” added Mr Mtambo.
We call on the international community to continue to closely monitor threats to civic space in Zambia and the situation of HRDS and to raise concerns in their interactions with the Government of Zambia.

Share this post