From Times of Zambia-EVENTS taking place in Zambia, driven by fanatical non-governmental organisations (NGOs), following the acquittal of second Republican president Frederick Chiluba of corruption charges by the magistrate court, bear the hallmarks of a planned uprising.
The Government must deal with the erring NGOs.
And it behoves the Home Affairs Minister Lameck Mangani, to follow up every lead to back up his statement that the NGOs, cooperating partners and donors were plotting against the Government.
Zambia has enjoyed peace since independence in 1964 and certain institutions making up the NGOs are those that thrive on chaos.
If Mr Mangani has proof of collusion between the NGOs, cooperating partners and Zambia’s senior and influential citizens, then the law must sooner than later take its course and nip in the bud the impending catastrophe.
The statement coming from a minister charged with overseeing the nation’s security is ominous and must be taken seriously by everyZambian who loves this country.
It is inconceivable that the acquittal of Dr Chiluba can cause so much revulsion and hatred as to compel 17 NGOs, representing themselves, to endanger the lives and security of more than 12 million Zambians.
First and foremost, the prosecution of Dr Chiluba was vested in the hands of private prosecutors who were adjudged by the same vocal NGOs to be competent.
These are the same people who offered their services free of charge but ended up being very well paid and overly protected when the nation raised some observations in the way they carried out the proceedings.
It is obvious that as prosecutors, the Mutembo Nchito led team did a dismal job. Their failure even to prove a single allegation should be the basis of protests rather than the acquittal.
Unless the NGOs can provide tangible proof of Government interference in the case, the Taskforce on Corruption should be in the dock to explain to the nation the seven years of dismal failure, justify the astronomical expenditure and of the failed investigation.
There must be parallel protests against the moribund Taskforce.
Clearly, individuals emerged rich and as chief executives of failed economic ventures in the same period the country has been bled to the bone by the same people involved in the crusade.
The protesters must question why investigations in the demise of Zambian Airways havestalled? It is interesting that at the recent Press conference by the NGOs, among the prominent people were those who served in the Taskforce, who were removed after noticing that the crusade was developing into a personal vendetta, was leading to individual enrichment while showing little progress.
MANY questions on some donations to the Task Force still remain unanswered. Equally of interest is the presence of three Roman Catholic institutions NGOs Caritas Zambia represented by its executive director Samuel Mulafalafu, Jesuit Centre for the Theological Reflection (JCTR)and Frank Bwalya of the yet to make an impact Change or Die Zambia (whatever his programme) at the high table.
This article believes, the rest of the group were merely escorting Caritas and JCTR. We wonder the pace at which Zambia is developing the culture of promoting nonentities into prominence!
The Roman Catholic as a church in Zambia has a bone to chew with successive governments whether under the United National Independence Party (UNIP) of Dr Kenneth Kaunda or the Movement for MultipartyDemocracy (MMD) of Dr Chiluba, late Levy Patrick Mwanawasa or the current Banda administration.
During Dr Kaunda’s reign, the contention was over the nationalisation of Catholic institutions, schools in particular, and his desire to introduce scientific socialism.
Under the MMD Government, the major issue is over the Constitution, mainly its preamble and declaration of Zambia as a Christian nation.
As for the NGOs, their bone of contention could only be the recently enacted NGO Act. How can it be proved that Caritas Zambia and JCTR are the driving force behind the wheel and the rest merely playing the role of seeing them off? Both Caritas and JCTR are backed by the Catholic Church and have international reputation and have roots deeply attached to the Vatican.
Very few financiers can doubt their credentials to give them funds. Zambia Episcopal Conference (ZEC), an umbrella body overseeing both Caritas and JCTR, in Zambia has been overly active in Zambian politics.
At the height of the third term debates before the 2001 December elections, the ZEC was able to bring together the anti-third term campaigners under the Citizen Forum on whose behalf ZEC received funds from the donors. It is commonplace that the opposition alliance United Democratic Alliance (UDA) was born and nurtured under the chairmanship of the Archbishop of Lusaka at ZEC headquarters in Kabulonga in 2001. It is a fact that the Catholic Church detests anything to do with the declaration of Zambia as a Christian nation and even for the initiator, in this case Dr Chiluba.
In law, the onus is on the prosecution to prove its allegation and the NGOs’ missiles are being misdirected. The Task Force directors and the prosecutors must first and foremost account for their earnings before blaming the Government for their shoddy work and raising emotions through the unruly NGOs who have no interest in the case or Zambia as a country except seeing it in flames.
Already, tongues are questioning why single out the Catholic organisations Caritas and JCTR? It is because these institutions are strangely not alien to fomenting dissent to protect the Catholic interests.
Three years ago, this writer was fortunate to come across a book The Enemy Unmasked written by Bill Hughes, in 2004 for TruthTriumphant, a publication of the Seventh Day Adventists, which was distributed freely to Members of Parliament.
The Enemy Unmasked has 12 chapters giving a chilling account of the Jesuit Order masked by the Illuminati-Jewish front to undermine the Constitution of the United States and promoting the papacy legend. The expunging religion from the American Constitution is termed as the greatest achievement by the Jesuits and the Catholic Church.
The Jesuit Order was created by the Vatican about 1550s as an answer to the reformation which had become so extensive in Europe that the papacy began to realise that they must do something to stop it. They realised that if it was not stopped, it would eventually undermine the position of the Catholic Church and destroy the absolute political power that the church enjoyed.
The Roman Catholic Church had ruled the world through dark ages and sought to keep the world under her dictatorial control. But for over 200 years, the Protestant reformation had challenged the papacy’s authority.
Hitherto in Europe all monarchs ruled by the permission of the papacy and had wielded tyrannical control for ages with no one to oppose them. In order, therefore, to destroy the reformation, the Vatican decided to create a new secret organisation within the Holy See called the Jesuits.
One of the Jesuits’ major purposes was to destroy every trace of protestantism and its principles. Those included religious freedom, republicanism, representative government, and an economy built around a strong middle class. Their other purpose was to greatly expand the power and control of the papacy throughout the entire world.
Do you wonder what is happening in United States where middle class has virtually been wiped out? Henry G Bohn in his preface of GB Nicolini’s History of the Jesuits: Their Origin, Progress, Doctrine, and Design wrote: “I cannot do too much to impress upon the minds of my readers that the Jesuits, by their very calling, by the very essence of their institution, are bound to seek, by every means, right or wrong, the destruction of protestantism.
This is the condition of their existence, the duty they must fulfil, or cease to be Jesuits…in the first instance, they must be considered as the bitterest enemies of the Protestant faith; in the second, as bad and unworthy priests; and in both cases, to be regarded with aversion and distrust.”
And that doyen of the Seventh Day Adventists EG White wrote of the Jesuits in The Great Controversy: “The first triumphs of the Reformation past, Rome summoned new forces, hoping to accomplish its destruction. At this time the order of the Jesuits was created; the most cruel, unscrupulous, and powerful of all the champions of popery… There was no crime too great for them to commit, no deception too base for them to practice, no disguise too difficult for them to assume.
Vowed to perpetual poverty and humility, it was their studied aim to secure wealth and power, to be devoted to the overthrow of Protestantism, and re-establishment of the papal supremacy.”
Mr Hughes writes that it was so that from the very beginning of the1540s, the Jesuits did just that, that they used any means they could devise to destroy Protestantism, including assassination of leaders who tried to bring freedom to their people.
He cites William of Orange (England) in 1584 and Henry IV in 1610, both slain by Jesuit assassins. He also brings out the macabre massacre at the St Bartholomew’s Day in 1572 where 70,000 Protestant Huguenots, including women and children were slain in one night. The Jesuits used deception in the extreme to bring about these killings.
History also credits them with the 30 year-old war from 1618 -1648 in order to destroy the Lutheransin Europe. “The blood that reddened European soil for centuries can be all traced back to murderous Jesuits,” Mr Hughes writes. “The Jesuits ruled the world. The monarchs of Europe, and the pope himself had Jesuit confessors. The plans and plots were all alike and known to them.”
Besides their influence, they were amassing a vast amount of wealth that allowed them to do whatever they chose. With them controlling the world, who had the power to stand against them?
In an instant they canutilise any army at their disposal and crush any uprising in the colonies. As it is said that greed and absolute power corrupts, so it happened with the Jesuits that there occurred a divine intervention.
It began in Portugal in 1759 following an abortive attempt to assassinate the Portuguese king, Joseph I. The deed had been incited by the Jesuits, who impressed ignorant and fanatical minds with the idea that no wrong was committed by killing a heretical king; that is one who did not submit to their dictation.
As a measure absolutely necessary to the life of the nation, the king issued a decree of banishment against the Jesuits as traitors, rebels, enemies to, and aggressors on, his person, his States, and the public and the general good of the people. The Jesuits were then seized and transported to the States of the Church in Italy. (Richard Thompson, The Footprintsof the Jesuits, Hunt & Eaton).
Thus King Joseph I became the first Catholic monarch to banish the Jesuits from his kingdom. And the dominoes began to fall one by one. Catholic France banished in 1762 through a decree by Louis XV and the French Parliament which described and denounced their doctrines and practice as: perverse, destructive of every principle of religion, and even probity; as injurious to morality, pernicious to society,seditious, dangerous to rights of persons of the sovereigns; as fit to excite the greatest troubles in States, to form and maintain corruption in the hearts of men…that the institutions of Jesuits should forever cease to exist throughout the whole extent of the kingdom.
The third sovereign to drive the Jesuits out from their realm was King Charles III of Spain in 1767 when the king was convinced that a riot in Madrid had been promoted by the Jesuits. One year later, yet another nation banished this evil brood from their realm. Under theleadership of Fr Manuel Pinto de Fonseca, the Jesuits were forced to leave the island of Malta in 1768 and all their property confiscated.
Evidently, the mightiest Catholic nations in Europe had banished theJ esuits from their realms. This was by no means the end as the monarchs went further to demand that the Catholic Church abolish the society forever. But Clement XIII, the Pope at that time, resisted the pressure from the kings, but finally capitulated.
Unfortunately, the night before he planned to abolish the Jesuits, he was poisoned. Could anyone doubt the assassins? Four years later in 1773, Pope Clement XIV wrote an order, the purpose of which was to abolish the Jesuits forever, reluctantly, though.
The following is what transpired: Again, in July 1773, Pope Clement XIV wrote an order dissolving the Society of Jesus. This bull, Dominus Redemptor, was published August 16 of that year. After issuing it, however, the Pope relented, infear of the consequences, and tried to withdraw it. Too late! The Spanish ambassador had already dispatched the document by a special courier direct to Madrid. The papal brief annihilated the Jesuit order throughout the world, closed its schools and cancelled its statutes. Its houses were occupied and its general and other dignitaries were imprisoned.
Following the catalogue of events as happened leading to the proscribing of the Jesuit Order in 1773 by Pope Clement XIV, the question now is how come they still exist?
Why is their presence in Zambia so pronounced that they have literally taken over the reins of governance that they have become an authority on any issue affecting the country? The Order was restored by a new Pope in 1814.
After so many of its members were imprisoned and banned in many countries of Europe and their colonies, the remaining Jesuits fled to countries which still accepted their order among them England, Prussia (Germany), and Russia. Many secret organisations and societies were created to hide but replicate the Jesuits. Prominent among these is the all powerful Illuminati.
The Illuminati was created during the suppression from 1773 and 1814 by Jesuits head General Ricci with his soldier, Adam Weishaupt, the Father of modern Communism, who, with his Jacobins, conducted the French Revolution. Adam Weishaupt also known as the Apostle of Lucifer, was born a Jew, converted to Catholicism. He then turned to witchcraft where he became an expert and went to find the Bavariansect of Illuminati on 1 May, 1776. (William Sutton, The New Age Movement and the Illuminati 666, The Institute of Religious Knowledge.)
According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume 12, page 251, Adam Weishaupt was a trained Jesuit. He was a professor at Ingolstadt University teaching Catholic Canon law, which was the Centre of the Jesuit counter-reformation. What is Canon law? And how can Weishauptbe the Father of Communism? What about Carl Marx, that celebrated luminary credited with the Communist Manifesto? Was he a plant of the Illuminati? Canon law was the result of the infamous Council of Trent, which met from 1545 – 1563.
This law revealed the Catholic Church’s stannce against Protestant Reformation and is known as the counter-reformation. This council not only revealed the church’s hostility towards reformation, but also how she would attack and destroy it.
Dr Weishaupt, therefore, established the Illuminati specifically to be a front organisation behind which the Jesuits could hide. After being abolished by Clement XIV in 1773, the Jesuits used Illuminati and other organisations to carry out their operations which would be blamed for the trouble caused by the Jesuits.
Also having so many front organisations would confuse the people so that it would be virtually impossible to know who is actually manipulating the wars, policies, politics and troubles caused by Jesuits.
In None Dare Call it Conspiracy, Concord Press, Gary Allen brings out the fact that the Communist Manifesto was in circulation for 70 years and Carl Marx merely updated and codified Weishaupt ideas under tutelage of the Illuminati to give it a name.
“All Carl Marx really did was update and codify the very same revolutionary plans and principles set down seventy years earlier by Adam Weishaupt, thefounder of the Order of Illuminati in Bavaria.
And, it is widelyacknowledged by serious scholars of this subject that the League of the Just Men was simply an extension of the Illuminati,” Allen explains.
Bill Hughes says the methods of many of the front organisations such as the Illuminati were carbon copies of the Jesuits methods and techniques. In his recruitment of adepts Weishaupt proceeded cautiously, not revealing to the novice doctrines that might be likelyto revolt him, of “speaking sometimes in one way, sometimes in another, so that one’s real purpose should remain impenetrable” to members of the inferior grades.
The Jesuits have unlimited reservoir of finances and assets that have been accumulated through centuries by powerful financiers and international bankers which include the House of Rothschild.
“After he(Weishaupt) formed his organisation with financial backing from the House of Rothschild, he adopted the name Illuminati … It was on May1, 1776 that Adam Weishaupt backed and led by the House of Rothschild, formed the International revolutionary force called the Illuminati, which later became known as communism.” (William Sutton, The New Age Movement and the Illuminati 666, Institute of Religious Knowledge.)
In his book Rulers of Evil, Harper Collins Publishers, F TupperSaussy reveals that aware that the Rothschilds were an important Jewish family, I looked them up in Encyclopedia Judaica and discovered that they bear the title “ Guardians of the Vatican Treasury…”
“The appointment of Rothschild gave black papacy absolute financial privacyand secrecy. Who would ever search a family of orthodox Jews for the key to the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church?”
Hughes said with the financial power of the Rothschilds, the Jesuits and the Catholic Church have an almost perfect cover to hide their operations from the view of the public.
When investigators try to trace the roots of certain events, the Illuiminati is a perfect shield behind which the Jesuits can hide, and behind which investigators cannot penetrate. He cites the book Descent into Slavery by DesGriffin, Emissary Publications in which chilling outlines of the two world wars and the impending third world war were planned 138 yearsago by the Illuminati.
This plan was outlined in graphic details by Albert Pike, the sovereign Grand Commander of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry and the top Illuminist in America, in a letter to Guisseppe Mazzini dated August 15, 1871.